For a general contractor, control.io documents your own progress so disputes are settled with images rather than arguments. The same flights that show an owner where the job stands also record owner-caused hold-ups, late design information and access problems for extension-of-time claims.
Last updated
Problems and answers
Show owners exactly where the programme stands and defend your own delay claims with the same evidence.
- 01
The problem
Extension-of-time claims fail without contemporaneous records.
With control.io
Every flight is a dated, hashed record of site condition, stored in one timeline.
- 02
The problem
Subcontractor progress is hard to see across a large frame.
With control.io
Per-trade progress on the 3D model shows which crew is behind on which floor.
- 03
The problem
Owner meetings turn into debates about percentages.
With control.io
Earned schedule turns progress into days, a unit everyone reads the same way.
Deliverables
- Per-trade, per-floor progress on the 3D model
- Contemporaneous record for delay and disruption claims
- Look-ahead comparison against the current programme
- Owner-ready PDF reports
- Stockpile and earthworks volumes
Will control.io be used against us by the owner?
The data is neutral: it records what was built and when. Contractors use the same record to prove owner-caused delays and support time extensions.
Can we use our own drone team?
Yes. We supply flight plans and an upload app; processing, comparison and reporting run on control.io.
Does it import our programme from scheduling software?
Upload a PDF export of the programme. The AI extracts activities and dates, and an engineer confirms them before first use.